Its not just the information you put out, it is even asking the question.

Asking the questions, that only a “monster” would ask

False Flags? Hoaxes? Government Conspiracies? Reptilian Elites? Nine Eleven and Alien Disclosure? CRISPR. CERN, NASA and Flat Earth. Gematria, Tarot, Bible Verse and Predictive Programming for Hive Mentality?

Are these things that you question, like I do?

It is not an easy road to travel. It is an isolated trudge up hill on a never ending dark deserted road. The more you open your mind to question things, the more those around you want to close it back up. If you do brave the waters and share your thoughts publicly, you are sure to attract negative response, shunning and queries of your mental well being.

The Daily Sheeple article titled The Fake Skeptics & The “Conspiracy Theorist” Slur, states “To question the official story, especially when that story has political consequences, is heresy, and they even have a special slur that they’ve invented for the heretics, one that is designed to marginalize and discredit them from a distance. They call them conspiracy theorists or extremists, occasionally adding the token left wing or right wing on to the end of the slur to amplify the effect. These are an Ad Hominem attack, the most common and low form of logical fallacy.”

There seems to be a growing number of people who question the official narrative we have been sold. This phenomenon has been labeled, Red Pilled. Know Your Meme has an ongoing and well documented account of the history and definitions of the term Red Pilled.

The Urban Dictionary definition of Red Pilled :Usually means that a Liberal has become more right winged.
Person 1: “Omg, Jennifer told me that she no longer feels she is Gender Queer!”
Person 2: “Perhaps she is now Red Pilled.”

The origin of the phrase Red Pilled is credited to a scene from the movie The Matrix “You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. Remember — all I am offering is the truth, nothing more. “

Labeling things, can act as fodder to ridicule. Your natural inclination to question, questionable events, is viewed as extreme. When did logical conclusion and open debate become so dangerous?

Filmmaker Cassie Jaye’s documentary titled The Red Pill: A feminist’s journey into the Men’s Rights Movement premiered in October of 2017. In the film, Jaye interviews both feminists and men’s rights activists (MRAs) in her investigation of MRAs as a hate movement. Through the course of the film, Jaye begins to question her feminist beliefs and judgement of the men’s rights movement.

And what was the response to a feminist questioning the men’s movement and finding common ground? Screenings of the film were canceled due to activist pressure in various locations around the world, including Melbourne, Australia and Ottawa, Canada.

On May 6th, 2017, Jaye tweeted a letter stating that Netflix had declined including The Red Pill in their film catalog, for unspecified reasons.

Jaye stated in a 2015 Martin Daubney, Telegraph article, “Making this was the most life-changing experience of my life. It completely changed how I see men, from my relationship with my boyfriend to my father figures. It will open doors for understanding how men work.”

People fear that which breaks the ideologies, belief structures, or concepts of reality that they armor themselves with.

Daryl Davis is a black musician who befriended numerous Klansmen while interviewing members for the book he authored, Klan-Destine Relationships.

Davis recounted his first meeting with Klan leader Roger Kelly at a Maryland motel in a 2013 Rebecca Savasito, Liberty Voice article.

“ Every time my cassette would run out of tape, I would reach down into my bag and pull out another. Every time I reached down, the bodyguard would reach for his gun. He didn’t know what was in the bag. After a while he relaxed and realized nothing was in the bag but cassettes and the bible. After about an hour, there was a very loud, strange noise which was ominous, and I was apprehensive. In the back of my mind, I heard my friend in my head saying ‘Mr. Kelly will kill you.’ I stood up and slammed my hands on the table, and I felt my life was in danger. When my hands hit the table, my eyes locked with his, and he could read them. We stared into each other’s eyes. The bodyguard was looking back and forth at us, but then my secretary Mary realized what had happened.The ice bucket had melted and the cans of soda shifted, and that’s what made the noise! We all began laughing at how stupid we all had been. In retrospect, it was a very important lesson that was taught ; All because a foreign entity of which we were ignorant, entered into our comfort zone, we became fearful of each other. The lesson learned is: ignorance breeds fear. If you don’t keep that fear in check, that fear will breed hatred. If you don’t keep hatred in check it will breed destruction.”

Numbed to reason and terrified of logic, people attack those who question. How dangerous can questioning events be?

Cynthia McKinney is quoted – “Some people are going to ask very safe questions. But someone like me who is not an insider, who’s not looking to be an insider. Who’s responsibility first and foremost is to the people and not to the system. Some one like me is going to want to get to the heart of the matter, to the root. To the truth.”

Cynthia McKinney was elected to the US House of Representatives from Georgia’s 4th and 11th districts from 1997 until she left the Democrat party in 2007.
McKinney braved the deep dark waters and asked the hard questions that no one wanted to ask and no one wanted to be asked.

Six months after the September 11th attacks, on March 25, 2002 Cynthia Mckinney gave an interview on KPFA Radio in Berkeley California . McKinney asked “ Now is the time for our elected officials to be held accountable. Now is the time for the media to be held accountable. Why aren’t the hard questions being asked? We knew there were numerous warnings of the events to come on September 11th. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, delivered one such warning. Those engaged in unusual stock trades immediately before September 11th, knew enough to make millions of dollars from United and American Airlines, certain insurance and brokerage firm’s stocks. What did this administration know? And when did it know it? Who else knew? And why did they not warn the innocent people of New York who were needlessly murdered? Then we had president Bush place a phone call to majority leader Senator Tom Daschle asking him not to investigate the events of September 11th. And then, hot on the heels of the presidents phone call was another phone call from the Vice President asking that Tom Daschel also not investigate the events that led to September 11th. My question is, what do they have to hide?”

And what was the response to Congresswoman Mckinney demanding the administration be held accountable for their failure to protect and serve the American people? She was labeled a Conspiracy Theorist.

During a Crossfire, Quote of the Day segment, Tucker Carlson stated “ Buckle your seatbelt’s, this congresswoman is a democrat from the Atlanta area. She is Cynthia McKinney and she has a conspiracy theory you won’t believe, hopefully.”

Whitehouse press Secretary Ari Flescher answered for the White houses response to Congresswoman McKinney, saying “ All I can tell you, is the congresswoman must be running for the hall of fame of the Grassy Knoll Society. I really don’t have anything to say that would lend any credibility to what she said.”

Eluding to those who question the assassination of JFK, as well as Congresswoman McKinney as “Crazy”. Not as “Curious”. Not as “Involved”. Just “Crazy”.

But Mckinney braved on. During a 2006 Defense Department Budget – House Armed Committee hearing, Congresswoman Mckinney had two questions for Donald Rumsfeld.

McKinney spoke of a September 2003 United Nations speech given by President George W Bush. In this speech, President Bush called for those involved in the sex trade, to be brought to punishment. At the same time, Dyncor, a company who was exposed in the buying and selling of women and children, continued to hold contracts with the Pentagon for administering the smallpox and anthrax vaccines. Dyncor was also at that same time working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program.

#1- Is it policy of the us government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?

The Comptroller General of the United States had indicated there were serious financial management problems at the Pentagon. In 1999 $2.3 trillion went missing, in 2000 $1.1 trillion went missing.

The pentagon has claimed the reason they can not account for the missing trillions is that their computers don’t communicate with each other. So McKinney asked.

#2 – Who has the contracts today to make those systems communicate with each other? How long have they had those contracts? And how much have the taxpayers paid for them?

Rumsfeld never gave a direct answer. He stumbles and falls and laughs through his awkward moments of being held to task. Cynthia McKinney was driven out of US Politics. She continues to ask questions.

Question: She ask, why is the US Government so subservient to Israel?

Response: On December 30, 2008, peace activists trying to bring aid to Gaza claimed their boat, the Dignity, had been rammed by Israeli gunboats in a “criminal attack” in international waters. The Free Gaza Movement said the Dignity was intercepted by several Israeli ships as it headed toward the Gaza Strip, which has been under Israeli aerial bombardment since the previous Saturday.

On June 30, 2009, the Israeli military attacked and boarded a Free Gaza Movement boat, the Spirit of Humanity, abducting 21 human rights workers from 11 countries, including Noble Peace Prize laureate Mairead Maguire and former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney. The passengers and crew were “forcibly dragged toward Israel.

Question: Why are we still waiting for answers about September 11th 2001?

Response: Cynthia McKinney was ridiculed and targeted by her colleges in Congress. She was accused of striking a police officer and smeared in the media as unstable, emotionally driven, race baiting, as well as being anti semitic.

Even as a Congressional leader, Cynthia McKinney could not get the answers she asked for and was vilified for even asking. Imagine if you ask the hard questions and you are just an average joe? What if you are an independent journalist? Ready to fully research and engage in hard hitting questions? Some one like Amy Goodman, with Democracy Now.

Enter Mark Phillips, Mechanical Engineer and is also a member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Mark became aware of Amy Goodman and the program Democracy Now in May of 2003 and helped campaign to have the show aired daily on his local public radio station as well as having the honor to introduce Amy at a November 2006 event. Mark had sat at dinners with Amy twice. Once in July of 2007, where Mark says they had friendly chat. It was when Mark sat at a dinner with Amy Goodman in July of 2009, that Amy suddenly found herself speechless.

Mark went to the 2009 dinner with the specific purpose to present Amy with evidence of controlled demolition of building seven and the twin towers on September 11th 2001. Mark presented peer reviewed research published in scientific journals. Research that had been performed on the nano thermite particles found in the debris of the world trade centers and building seven. Mark left the research with Amy, who was at this point visibly uncomfortable, and begged that she simply interview one of the authors of the debris study, before bidding his fellow diners, “Adieu”.

Amy Goodman, Independent journalist, hard hitting purveyor of truth, sat on this research and did nothing with it. Three years later in 2012, Amy Goodman was on a speaking tour in San Luis Obispo California. Mark Phillips decided to attend and ask Amy “Why have you not moved forward with the information you have?”

Mark introduces himself to Amy at the book signing and as she remembers who he is, he reminds her that he had presented her with research into the 9/11 attacks. Amy starts to nervously shuffle papers and avoid eye contact. Mark states “I was pretty impressed by how un impressed you were with the information I presented to you.” Amy brushes Mark off, complaining he is holding up the line.

In 2009, Jeremy Rothe – Bushel with We AreChangeLA confronted Amy Goodman at a book signing to question her lack of questioning the events of September 11th 2001.
Jeremy starts by mentioning a previous Democracy Now show where Amy was discussing the CIA’s infiltration of journalism. Amy smiles and nods in acknowledgment of her truth telling.

Her facial expression quickly changes from open and smiling, to nervous and tight lipped, as Jeremy says “Not that 9/11 was an inside job and a black op, because we know that our alleged leaders are known to have done these kinds of things over the years, but that the media, including the progressive media, has not only been scooped on it. Myspace pages of teenagers and twitter accounts have been attacked. This group of citizen journalist, who have actually put together a lot of the investigations in support of 9/11, has been attacked, ignored by The Nation magazine, ignored by Mother Jones, what do you think of that?”

Amy responds “ I just think it needs to be investigated and we will continue to… ya know, look into it, but there is a line forming, so…” as she waves Jeremy aside so she can greet some easier conversation in.

Jeremy reminds her that not only has there been ongoing investigations but there are now peer reviewed journals published on the matter. Like the research that had been handed to her by Mark Phillips.

Why has Democracy Now, who is supposedly this beacon of honest and hard hitting journalism, not invited any of the authors of these reviews ? Amy rushes off to an interview she has scheduled and say’s she has no time for questions.

Tucker Carlson continued on with his refusal to question the events of 9/11 and he belittled any who did question.

When AVTM Minneapolis corespondent Tea Mage, engaged Tucker Carlson at a 2012 Michelle Bachmann event in West Des Moines Iowa, he questioned Tucker about his early exit from a 2008 Ron Paul event, that Carlson was at the time in the midst of emceeing.

Tucker responded “ I didn’t bail on Ron Paul, it was when Jesse Ventura got up and started saying, 9/11 was an inside job.”

When asked how one controversial comment could cause him to abandon his responsibilities and have to exit the event?

Tucker answered “ I was enraged, I was enraged by it. It wasn’t controversial, it was stupid. And if there is any evidence the government was behind 9/11, I would believe anything, if there is any evidence but there isn’t any. So, knock it off.”

Tucker Carlson later went on to state “Alex Jones? Fuck you. I certainly don’t want any Alex Jones people in my house.”

When you say you got your information from Alex Jones, you have opened your self to ridicule. Alex Jones acts as the clown. A very scary clown, that screams out that the sky is falling. It is easy to miss the nano particles of truth, through the clouds of freeze dried meat products.

Alex Jones and Infowars acting as puppets to normalize the ridiculing of questioning the narrative, has been debated and speculated on. I can see how Alex Jones showmanship, upstages any useful information he is sharing.

The carnival call headline on Infowars – “They are turning the frog’s gay!”

The Berkeley News headline – “Pesticide atrazine can turn male frogs into females.”

See what they did there?

In a show of good faith and fairness, Tucker Carlson agreed to sit down for an interview with Alex Jones in 2014. At the end of the interview, Jones and Carlson discuss some things they disagree on. Jone’s claims the media had distorted what he had said about 9/11.

He states, he had said that the high-jackers were trained at bases in Saudi Arabia and let into the US, even though they were on the terrorist list.

He list his research, showing evidence of NORAD standing down. Jones shows his example with interviews of Secretary of Transportation, Norman Mineta.

Mineta tells of Vice President Dick Cheney being warned when the planes were 50, 30 and then 10 miles out. Cheney continued to order to stand down.

Jones stated he questions how the buildings fell straight down into their own footprints, if it was not a planned demolition? And if it was a necessary demolition, why not be transparent about it?

Jones mentions the 1999 Documentary film One Day in September, an examination of the 1972 September 5th murders of 11 Israeli athletes at the Summer Olympics in Munich, Germany where German officials worked with the Palestinian terrorist group Black September Organization, to receive more funding for the Olympics.

Jones points out, Gulf of Tonkin was staged, Seymour Hersh claims that the Bin Laden raid was staged, if a Government is caught lying this much why would we buy what they say at face value?

Tucker agrees that bureaucracy creates corruption and deception by it’s nature and claims to be very skeptical of claims made by any big organization.

When Tucker states the idea of something as big as 9/11 being pulled off, with no insiders ever coming forward, as evidence against those who question the narrative, Jones comes back with Sibel Edmonds.

Sibel Edmonds worked as an FBI translator and states she had heard certain elements of the CIA communicating and working with Al Qaeda up until September 11th 2001. Sibel says that too many people know about this for it to not be investigated.

She claims that all members of the 9/11 commission know, several sitting members of congress know, everybody in the FBI who was involved knows, everyone in the Department of Justice knows, so why are they not asking the questions, that Mrs. Edmonds is asking?

Jones continues to point out some more inconsistencies in the 9/11 narrative and discuss them with Carlson. Finally, Jones shows Tucker a video of the collapse of building 7. Tucker Carlson states he had never viewed the video of building 7 collapsing.

I would like to point something out. Tucker Carlson, a journalist, never bothered to watch the collapse of building number seven. He easily laughs off and mocks those who question, yet he has never bothered to take a look into this for himself?

The two watched as Dan Rather described the scene as reminiscent of what you see when a building is deliberately destroyed.

The two men pondered the footage of Jane Stanley with the BBC, reporting the collapse of building seven, with building seven clearly in the back ground, 25 minutes before building seven collapsed.

They watched footage from CNN, telling people to get back from the building as it was about to be blown up.

They listened to World Trade Center Leaseholder, Larry Silverstein describe the decision to demolish building number seven on September 11th and how they watched the building collapse.

And now that Jones had pulled back the curtain and exposed Carlson to some new information, what were Carlson’s thoughts?

Tucker shrugs and says “Ya know, I’m not a structural engineer, I think it’s upsetting to watch and I remember when that happened. I mean look, I have no idea, I don’t know anything. I don’t understand how buildings collapse, I don’t understand how building seven collapsed. I find it really hard to believe that the US Government was in league with Al Qaeda, I just don’t believe it. If evidence emerges that they were, I will be the first one picketing the White House.”

When Congressional leaders are shunned when they ask. Mainstream media refuses to ask and (so called) independent journalist, cower in fear when it comes to asking the hard questions. You need a  Monster to ask the questions, that only a monster could ask.

Alex Jones often fills the roll of  Monster.

When it came time to question Sandy Hook, Alex Jones donned his angry little shoulders and barged in. Jones received major backlash for his questioning.

In a 2017 interview with Megyn Kelly, Alex is questioned about his questioning of Sandy Hook.

The program begins with painting Alex Jones as a dangerous, fly off the handle, conspiracy theory nut, who traffics in the “sickest, most offensive types of theories”. With Jones often erratic, machismo behavior, only helping to cement his bad reputation.

Jones stated in 2014 that he believed the Sandy Hook shooting was a complete hoax. During the 2017 interview Jones admits to playing the devils advocate (Monster) but holds firm that there was mass manipulation and a cover up surrounding Sandy Hook.

Megyn Kelly ask Jones about questioning the Sandy Hook parents, saying “ When you say the parents faked their children deaths, people get very angry.”

Jones responds “ Oh I know, but they don’t get angry about the half million dead Iraqis from the sanctions or they don’t get angry about all of the illegals pouring in.”

Kelly interrupts Jones , accusing him of dodging the question.

Jones argues that it isn’t a dodge. He points at the media for “ not covering any of the evil wars it has promoted…”

Kelly interrupts again, saying “ That doesn’t excuse what you said and did about New Town and you know it.”

With great confusion, Megyn ask Jones “ But Alex, the parents, one after the other, devastated. The dead bodies that the coroner autopsied…”

Alex jumps in stating “ And they blocked all of that. They won’t release any of it and that is unprecedented.”

Monster.

That is another example of Jones scratching the surface of truth, while tainting it with vagueness.

The Connecticut House of Representatives gave final litigation, preventing the release of crime scene photos and video evidence from the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre and other homicides, creating an exemption to the States Freedom of Information Act laws, as they apply to homicides in the state of Connecticut, which was truly, unprecedented.

Sandy Hook parent, Neil Hesslin, was also interviewed for the NBC program.

ZeroHedge published an article, pointing out inconsistencies in Mr. Hesslin’s story, as well as the hypocrisy of Megyn Kelly failing to fact check the story before broadcasting it, after smearing Alex Jones for doing the same.

And what was it that Jones did, so monstrous, so invasive, that the Newtown Board of Education wrote to the newly elected President Trump, asking that “he intervene to try to stop Jones and other hoaxers like him”?

He asked for proof.

A tenured PhD professor at Florida Atlantic University at Boca Raton and former Faculty Union President and officer, Dr. James Tracy, questioned what we were told about the events of December 14th, 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut.

Dr. Tracy contributed to the book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook, authored by Jim Fetzer and Mike Palecek . Dr. Tracy also contributes to Memoryholeblog.com investigating the  Sandy Hook shootings and other questionable events.

Dr. Tracy had also been questioning, both the Faculty Union and the University, about the Universities policies on Outside Activities forms. This questioning was deemed to be insubordination and misconduct by the administration, as well as partial grounds for Dr. Tracy’s firing. Tracy did not back down and went into litigation with the University. He ultimately lost the case and his tenure was terminated.

Neither Dr. Tracy nor the University spoke to the media for a number of days. During this time, with no commentary to report, the media construed Dr. Tracy’s firing as a “Free Speech issue”. They deemed a letter Dr. Tracy had sent to Sandy Hook parent Lenny Posner concerning a copy right infringement claim, as harassment and connected it to the termination of Dr.Tracy’s tenure.

This, in addition to the analysis and critiques he had done on the events of Sandy Hook, Dr. James Tracy was given the monster label and disregarded. He points out the truly frightening discovery that came of this. The media had decided a professor was fired over a free speech issue and they were okay with that.

There are others that continue asking the hard questions. Scientist, Military professionals, journalist, researchers and lawyers, all putting their lively hood, their safety and their reputations, on the line to find the answers to the questions, that most are too afraid to ask to even ask.

And then there are those who observe and try to make sense or find logic in these things. The commentators from across the street. Truly independent journalist, chained to no one and free to speak their opinions and report their analysis. Bloggers, V loggers and commenters, in a grand information and data sharing network.

The names won’t come up often around water coolers, you won’t hear them mentioned on televised or cable news. Some are more well known then others.

Jake R. Morphonios is an investigative journalist for The End Times News Report, who reports on events from a sometimes Biblical view. Jake is a former political strategist and advisor. He follows through with focus on current events, while investigating the things that just don’t add up. He has been vigilant in his reporting the Las Vegas shooting and actions surrounding the event.

Jake works full-time on his reporting and is able to do so through viewers support. He has been harassed, followed, hacked and his family has been threatened. Is Jake really that big of a threat?

Nathan Stolpman livestream’s from his YouTube channel Lift The Veil, admittedly, from his fathers garage. Nathan tags himself as “Usually right. Always honest”. As a long time listener and big fan of Nathan’s show, I can vouch that the tag is accurate. Nathan does not claim to be anything more then he is. He is an observant human who enjoys researching and sharing information. He seeks the truth in a world full of lies.

People who question are often labeled as mentally ill. Nathan openly admits he has a history of mental illness, it isn’t something he seems to feel shame about, or something he finds necessary to hide.

Where some might see this as a weakness, I ask you to stand in a group of five people. I would bet that at least three of the five, had at some point in their life been treated for mental illness. Look at those people, if you knew they had been treated for anxiety or depression, within their lifetime, would that cause you to disregard everything they say as “mad”?

Then why should Nathan’s observations be any less valid then anyone else’s?

Nathan covers a wide range of topics and does a live call in show. He has interviewed Doctors, Scientist and Investigators. For his observations and musings Nathan has had his channel shut down multiple times. He continues to start new channels, in the mad chase of freedom of speech, on YouTubes increasingly censored platform.

Nathan has been stalked, and he has had the police come to his home, following up on a false call to 911, reporting a suicide attempt. Why are Nathan’s observations so scary to some? Who would be so motivated to silence “some guy making videos in his dads garage”?

These are the big questions.

The Why’s:

– Why not allow Nathan to question?

I don’t see how his observations can be construed as some kind of threat or hate speech. He is not calling troops of citizens to ride up in revolt, or claiming to be God. He is just an observant human, let him tell us what he sees.

– Why work to end the career of one of the very few in congress who is brave enough to demand truth from those in power?

When so many of our officials are found to be corrupted and working for the very system they are supposed to be holding checks and balances on, it is self defeating to ridicule those who are brave enough to call out the questions and not fear the answers.

– Why are so many, so fearful of a professor’s analysis of the Sandy Hook shootings?

The reality that our government has staged events to sway public opinion has been shown over and over. With FOIA request being filled and published, we have verified proof that this is true.

This thought seems the scariest for people. That we could all be so easily manipulated, to mourn the deaths of children who never died. Manipulated to support passing legislation,  around events that were never fully investigated. Legislation that sacrifices our rights and helps to shield us from the ugly truth’s we are too afraid to face.

Allow Dr. Tracy and others to analyze the data and publish their  findings. Even if you choose to not look past the point you are told, don’t dissuade other’s from forging bravely ahead.

– Why do we trust so much of what, a proven corrupt, media and government tells us is true?

The truth is often scarier than the fiction we make up in our heads. It is easy to take the blue pill. It is easy to trust that the same government who was unable to keep us shielded from terrorist attacks on September 11th, will now be able to thwart attacks, because we agreed to be prodded through a line and be x – rayed when we travel.

If you need to shield your eyes, do not feel the need to blind fold others.

In Part 2 of Monster, we will explore the stories of those who question not only What is happening in our world but What is our world?

Links of inspiration – https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT5sYJsN1PkxYuyrEMoWaX-TxnCDVCask

conspiracy slur – http://www.thedailysheeple.com/fake-skeptics-the-conspiracy-theorist-slur_062014

Urban dictionary- https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=red+pilled

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/red-pill

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/the-red-pill-the-movie-about-men-that-feminists-didnt-want-you-t/
Cynthia Mckinney Dynco https://youtu.be/yJK3RvkSJFg
$2.3 Trillion https://youtu.be/W-F5NKAMdFc
CM smeared for 9/11 ? https://youtu.be/c2QoQml27NI
Israel http://www.thehypertexts.com/Archive/Israel%20Audacity%20of%20Hope%20Liberty%20Dignity%20Spirit%20of%20Humanity%20Nakba.htm